If you’re a white person living in this modern era, on this “PissEarth” and you want to understand why things have gotten so bad, I’m going to explain the nuts and bolts of this system. If you can’t help but notice that being white has effectively been made illegal and you aren’t sure exactly how this process works, the following material is a manual to your own marginalization.
1. Your civilization has been colonized with virtues belonging to an alien culture
I don’t know to explain this to you honestly without heading into some very controversial waters immediately. There just isn’t any possible way to sugarcoat the plain facts of this case. In modern Western societies, you have been saturated with a media and news culture that always paints the victim, the oppressed class, and the bullied as the most virtuous, and this is fundamentally a Jewish set of values.
I want you to stop and ask yourself why this should be the case from an objective point of view. It’s entirely possible a victim could actually be a terrible person, an oppressed class might actually not be composed of good people, and being the target of a bully doesn’t automatically make you a saint. The philosopher Bertrand Russel talked about this phenomena over a century ago, calling it the “Superior Moral Virtue of the Oppressed“. There is no reason to believe victims are somehow morally better than people who aren’t victims, so why does this message get endlessly repeated? Why is this is such a popular way to climb the social hierarchy that individuals will FAKE being oppressed?
The answer involves a German philosopher, the Jewish people, and the demographics of our media industry. To Friedrich Nietzsche, much of western history was shaped by the values of the strong. This so called “Master Morality” reflected the preferences of those who acquired power. These tastes for beauty, strength, and refinement came to be seen as virtues unto themselves because the people with those values were at the top of the social hierarchy.
Conversely, the underclass and the Jewish people came to simply value the exact opposite of what ever was popular among the elites, seemingly out of spite for being unable to enact their own will as their masters did. Nietzsche called this process “reesentiment” and believed that “slave morality” evolved as a reaction and rejection of “master morality”. This is why gender politics is effectively just an all-out assault on anything “noble” or “traditional”. The gender activist actually sees values like strong monogamous marriages as morally evil, they just couch it in academic language.
Of course it is almost inarguable that the Jewish people constructed an entire common mythology based on stories of their captivity and see themselves a beleaguered minority in a constant struggle against hostile majorities. Jews eventually developed something of a hegemony in mass media and entertainment in the western world, particularly America, along with a political power they do not deny when describing their success with certain “social justice projects”.
It’s only natural that if an ethnic group gains control of media platforms they will tell the stories of their people and promote their own values. This explains why the trope of plucky rebels fighting vast institutional power structures became firmly entrenched in popular culture. Rebels are always good, the status quo is evil, and institutions are never anything except the corrupt tools of oppressive regimes. I’m sure if the Chinese ran our media for a century we’d also get a very alien set of moral intuitions that are at odds with our western traditions.
2. White privilege
Working from this frame you can understand how white privilege developed as a weapon to attack the perceived dominate group. Rather than directly vilify and dehumanize a group of people, white privilege seeks to do this indirectly by accusing a group of racial extortion. The essential premise is that whites created systems that extract value from non-whites and elevate themselves at the expense of others. This is a nasty trick because the natural response of most people accused of this kind of oppression is to defend themselves from the specific allegations instead of just rejecting the entire idea wholesale. This is exactly the sort of hoodoo you’d expect from a hostile tribe behind enemy lines.
You will notice that the among the smarter academics the trick is to attack “whiteness”, but not individual whites. This is pretty much the same thing as claiming you are not Anti-Semitic because you simply object to “Jewishness”, not individual Jews. No one is going to buy this claim
If pressed, you’ll find that people attacking “white privilege” cannot name any identifiable “white” characteristic that they approve of. It’s a distinction without a difference to claim not to be anti-white while hating everything associated with the racial category. You will further notice this is a criticism of what gets to be “normal”. The idea a society mostly composed of European whites organically trend towards their preferences and values being the standard is actually the problem here, and this makes sense only if you’re an outsider living in some kind of fear of the status quo.
This is basically just a politically correct method of dehumanization. Usually attacking an entire racial group makes you look like a real asshole, but “white privilege” lets you get away with it. It’s like calling someone a rapist; everyone’s first impulse is to exculpate themselves, they don’t usually attack the very concept of unfounded rape allegations themselves. We also know that the entire society at large takes a very dim view of rapists, leading us to the third important point.
3. Victimhood as a weapon
In this greater context, claims of victimhood are not only used to elevate the social status of the victim but to attack an individual or group by painting a target on them. Someone is responsible and that someone is gonna pay. This was the entire point of the Covington charade, it wasn’t simply about feeling sorry for a poor mistreated Indian, this was about producing moral license to take vengeance on his “oppressors”. Nathan Phillips was not an important piece of news, the existence of privileged bigot high-schoolers was the main story. You have a culture programmed to feel overly invested in the “underdog” of any given scenario, an academic reframing of white folks as the dog abusers, now you must only produce a “victim” to goad the masses into howling for the heads of the whites responsible. There is obviously no shortage of “victims” ready to draw fake swastikas, claim to be lynched, or set their own houses on fire just to set the hounds loose on the nearest white folk.
Every fake hate crime, every mass media hyper-ventilation about “Neo-Nazis” is just another entry in an even grander fake epic designed to stir up anti-white hostility. This is a type of blood libel used to paint every white man as a secret genocidal racist that deserves no human consideration. The media itself needs to amplify and tell this story, the story of how the tribe of people who own the media view living in a white European society. They’ve already convicted you in their imaginations, the victims themselves are just the physical evidence.
Now that you know the components of this system the permutations of how it will treat news happenings and whites in general should be obvious. This is essentially an anti-white occupation regime at this point with all media and even law enforcement focused on constantly reminding white folks they are under firm control by the establishment. No jokes, no fun allowed, absolutely no organizing around white issues, and continual Inquisition campaigns to keep white heads ducked down under their desks.
It’s not going to get better anytime soon.